iptime 공유기 (AX2004T), 유선 핑 테스트 결과 (Ping Test)
-
- 2025.09.27 - 14:20 2025.09.24 - 18:02 634 11
테스트 장비
- 공유기#1 : Asus AC-68U
- 공유기#2 : iptime AX2004T
ㄴ https://prod.danawa.com/info/?pcode=95848220&keyword=ax2004t&cate=112804
- 노트북 : HP Victus, Realtek RTL8852AE WiFi6, Realtek Gaming GbE Family Controller
테스트 절차
* 정확한 값을 얻기 위해 파이썬 ping3 라이브러리를 활용함.
* 노트북(윈도우11) 에서 ping 을 대략 100회 정도 실시함.
* 노트북과 공유기는 장애물 없이 50cm 정도 떨어져 있음.
* 공유기#2(AX2004T)에는 노트북 외에 물려있는 장치는 없고, 테스트 중 다른 작업 하지 않음.
* 공유기#1(AC-68U)에는 원래 집에서 쓰던 각종 저부하 장치(WIFI) 그대로 연결되어 있음.
테스트 결과
| 테스트 | 경로 | 패킷 손실 | 응답속도(평균) | 응답속도(최소/최대) | 표준편차 |
| 1 | 노트북→유선→공유기#2 (AX2004T) | 0.0% | 1.469 ms | 0.807 / 13.924 ms | 1.763 ms |
| 2 | 노트북→유선→공유기#2→유선→공유기#1 | 0.0% | 1.932 ms | 1.152 / 17.853 ms | 2.219 ms |
| 3 | 노트북→유선→공유기#1 (AC-68U) | 0.0% | 1.095 ms | 0.903 / 2.730 ms | 0.205 ms |
DATA
# 테스트 1 : 노트북 ->유선->공유기#2(192.168.23.1) C:\Users\creer>C:\Users\creer\gemini\ping_us.py 192.168.23.1 -n 100 Pinging 192.168.23.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=0 time=1.066ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=1 time=0.963ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=2 time=0.981ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=3 time=0.917ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=4 time=0.911ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=5 time=0.958ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=6 time=0.878ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=7 time=1.043ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=8 time=5.022ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=9 time=0.973ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=10 time=0.990ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=11 time=1.108ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=12 time=0.998ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=13 time=8.056ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=14 time=1.002ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=15 time=1.002ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=16 time=1.093ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=17 time=1.050ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=18 time=1.972ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=19 time=0.946ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=20 time=0.916ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=21 time=1.059ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=22 time=0.997ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=23 time=1.087ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=24 time=0.937ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=25 time=0.973ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=26 time=0.916ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=27 time=0.954ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=28 time=1.122ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=29 time=0.993ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=30 time=0.974ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=31 time=1.022ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=32 time=0.971ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=33 time=1.024ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=34 time=0.912ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=35 time=0.965ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=36 time=1.090ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=37 time=1.240ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=38 time=0.957ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=39 time=1.083ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=40 time=0.944ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=41 time=0.971ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=42 time=1.880ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=43 time=1.020ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=44 time=1.073ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=45 time=0.969ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=46 time=1.091ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=47 time=4.338ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=48 time=1.029ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=49 time=1.070ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=50 time=0.992ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=51 time=1.107ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=52 time=1.043ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=53 time=1.140ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=54 time=1.045ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=55 time=1.039ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=56 time=0.972ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=57 time=1.034ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=58 time=1.005ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=59 time=13.924ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=60 time=1.904ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=61 time=0.911ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=62 time=0.807ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=63 time=1.078ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=64 time=1.008ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=65 time=1.031ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=66 time=1.154ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=67 time=1.020ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=68 time=0.970ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=69 time=6.911ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=70 time=0.966ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=71 time=0.960ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=72 time=0.947ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=73 time=0.971ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=74 time=1.006ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=75 time=1.062ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=76 time=1.950ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=77 time=1.159ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=78 time=0.942ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=79 time=0.979ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=80 time=1.024ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=81 time=1.100ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=82 time=1.002ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=83 time=0.964ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=84 time=0.959ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=85 time=0.941ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=86 time=3.217ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=87 time=1.004ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=88 time=1.031ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=89 time=0.965ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=90 time=0.890ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=91 time=1.139ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=92 time=1.142ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=93 time=8.522ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=94 time=1.317ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=95 time=0.954ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=96 time=0.993ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=97 time=1.010ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=98 time=1.005ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=99 time=1.014ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=100 time=0.981ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=101 time=1.304ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=102 time=0.923ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=103 time=2.283ms Reply from 192.168.23.1: seq=104 time=1.065ms --- Ping statistics --- 105 packets transmitted, 105 received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.807/1.469/13.924/1.763 ms # 테스트 2 : 노트북 ->유선->공유기#2(192.168.23.1)->유선->공유기#1(192.168.68.1) C:\Users\creer>C:\Users\creer\gemini\ping_us.py 192.168.68.1 Pinging 192.168.68.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=0 time=1.486ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=1 time=2.114ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=2 time=1.337ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=3 time=1.376ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=4 time=1.338ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=5 time=1.470ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=6 time=1.492ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=7 time=1.558ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=8 time=5.329ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=9 time=1.796ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=10 time=1.431ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=11 time=1.303ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=12 time=1.347ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=13 time=4.527ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=14 time=1.243ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=15 time=1.457ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=16 time=1.162ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=17 time=1.440ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=18 time=9.523ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=19 time=1.321ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=20 time=1.229ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=21 time=1.292ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=22 time=1.398ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=23 time=1.239ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=24 time=1.214ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=25 time=5.787ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=26 time=1.301ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=27 time=5.400ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=28 time=2.135ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=29 time=1.203ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=30 time=1.376ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=31 time=1.224ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=32 time=1.766ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=33 time=1.623ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=34 time=1.525ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=35 time=1.261ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=36 time=1.351ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=37 time=1.152ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=38 time=1.892ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=39 time=1.303ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=40 time=1.351ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=41 time=1.439ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=42 time=1.352ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=43 time=1.368ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=44 time=1.391ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=45 time=1.272ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=46 time=1.327ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=47 time=4.642ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=48 time=1.321ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=49 time=1.421ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=50 time=1.328ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=51 time=1.183ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=52 time=1.578ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=53 time=1.339ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=54 time=1.356ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=55 time=1.231ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=56 time=1.391ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=57 time=1.389ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=58 time=1.248ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=59 time=1.406ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=60 time=1.411ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=61 time=1.197ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=62 time=1.227ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=63 time=1.251ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=64 time=1.308ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=65 time=1.314ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=66 time=1.304ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=67 time=1.893ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=68 time=1.217ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=69 time=2.179ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=70 time=1.365ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=71 time=1.297ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=72 time=1.542ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=73 time=1.230ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=74 time=1.349ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=75 time=1.235ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=76 time=1.584ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=77 time=1.527ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=78 time=1.346ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=79 time=1.317ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=80 time=1.237ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=81 time=11.835ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=82 time=1.465ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=83 time=1.471ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=84 time=1.420ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=85 time=1.413ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=86 time=17.853ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=87 time=1.372ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=88 time=1.318ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=89 time=1.292ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=90 time=1.305ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=91 time=1.414ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=92 time=1.292ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=93 time=1.293ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=94 time=1.368ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=95 time=1.199ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=96 time=1.261ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=97 time=1.307ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=98 time=2.218ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=99 time=1.360ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=100 time=1.277ms --- Ping statistics --- 101 packets transmitted, 101 received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.152/1.932/17.853/2.219 ms # 테스트 3 : 노트북 ->유선->공유기#1(192.168.68.1) C:\Users\creer>C:\Users\creer\gemini\ping_us.py 192.168.68.1 Pinging 192.168.68.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=0 time=1.055ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=1 time=1.056ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=2 time=1.008ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=3 time=1.065ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=4 time=1.099ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=5 time=1.016ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=6 time=1.028ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=7 time=1.110ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=8 time=1.002ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=9 time=1.009ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=10 time=1.023ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=11 time=1.106ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=12 time=0.999ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=13 time=1.083ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=14 time=1.121ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=15 time=0.988ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=16 time=1.112ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=17 time=1.031ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=18 time=0.987ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=19 time=1.135ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=20 time=1.048ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=21 time=1.095ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=22 time=1.725ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=23 time=0.968ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=24 time=0.957ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=25 time=1.109ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=26 time=1.052ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=27 time=1.132ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=28 time=1.453ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=29 time=0.996ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=30 time=0.954ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=31 time=1.069ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=32 time=0.952ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=33 time=1.190ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=34 time=1.168ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=35 time=1.078ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=36 time=1.019ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=37 time=1.041ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=38 time=1.011ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=39 time=1.122ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=40 time=1.015ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=41 time=1.094ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=42 time=1.649ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=43 time=1.072ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=44 time=1.072ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=45 time=1.286ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=46 time=0.969ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=47 time=1.614ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=48 time=1.160ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=49 time=1.120ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=50 time=1.241ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=51 time=1.107ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=52 time=1.004ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=53 time=2.730ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=54 time=1.173ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=55 time=1.075ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=56 time=1.038ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=57 time=1.034ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=58 time=1.036ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=59 time=1.143ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=60 time=1.084ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=61 time=1.067ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=62 time=1.024ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=63 time=0.903ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=64 time=1.062ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=65 time=1.000ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=66 time=1.151ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=67 time=1.084ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=68 time=1.041ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=69 time=1.026ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=70 time=1.125ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=71 time=1.049ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=72 time=1.067ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=73 time=0.952ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=74 time=1.057ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=75 time=1.028ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=76 time=1.108ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=77 time=1.057ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=78 time=0.992ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=79 time=1.020ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=80 time=1.021ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=81 time=1.111ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=82 time=1.088ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=83 time=0.990ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=84 time=1.154ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=85 time=1.081ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=86 time=1.012ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=87 time=1.143ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=88 time=1.094ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=89 time=1.072ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=90 time=1.060ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=91 time=0.936ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=92 time=1.047ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=93 time=1.005ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=94 time=1.072ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=95 time=1.087ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=96 time=0.951ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=97 time=1.071ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=98 time=1.031ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=99 time=1.079ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=100 time=1.041ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=101 time=1.094ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=102 time=1.022ms Reply from 192.168.68.1: seq=103 time=0.907ms --- Ping statistics --- 104 packets transmitted, 104 received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.903/1.095/2.730/0.205 ms C:\Users\creer>
-
25
댓글11
-
세상의모든계산기
유선) hrping 핑 테스트
hrping.exe 192.168.23.1 -n 1000
This is hrPING v5.07.1150 by cFos Software GmbH -- https://www.cfos.de
(중략)
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=1000, error=0, lost=0 (0.0% loss) in 499.511856 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 0.618 / 1.679 / 20.264 / 2.347
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.120
- 노트북->유선->AX2004T
- 테스트 중 유튜브 시청함
-
세상의모든계산기
노트북(클라이언트) -> 유선 -> AX2004T -> 유선 -> 데탑(PC, 서버)
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.23.5 -p 5000 -t 10 -f m -i 2
Connecting to host 192.168.23.5, port 5000
[ 4] local 192.168.23.4 port 4985 connected to 192.168.23.5 port 5000
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-2.00 sec 188 MBytes 786 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-4.00 sec 191 MBytes 800 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-6.00 sec 184 MBytes 771 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-8.00 sec 184 MBytes 770 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-10.00 sec 191 MBytes 800 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 936 MBytes 785 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 936 MBytes 785 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64> -
세상의모든계산기
무선 2.4G) hrping 핑 테스트
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=999, error=0, lost=1 (0.1% loss) in 499.507024 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 1.103 / 10.756 / 1793.124 / 80.016
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.119
- 노트북->무선(2.4G)->AX2004T
- 테스트 중 유튜브 시청함
-
세상의모든계산기
노트북(클라이언트) -> 무선 2.4G -> AX2004T -> 유선 -> 데탑(PC, 서버)
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.23.5 -p 5000 -t 10 -f m -i 2
Connecting to host 192.168.23.5, port 5000
[ 4] local 192.168.23.2 port 5129 connected to 192.168.23.5 port 5000
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-2.00 sec 47.5 MBytes 199 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-4.00 sec 52.0 MBytes 218 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-6.00 sec 50.4 MBytes 211 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-8.00 sec 50.6 MBytes 212 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-10.00 sec 49.0 MBytes 206 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 250 MBytes 209 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 249 MBytes 209 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64> -
세상의모든계산기
비교 : AC-68U
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 65.0 MBytes 54.5 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 65.0 MBytes 54.5 Mbits/sec receiver
이상해서 다시 접속
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.68.36 -p 5000 -t 10 -f m -i 2
Connecting to host 192.168.68.36, port 5000
[ 4] local 192.168.68.217 port 12792 connected to 192.168.68.36 port 5000
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-2.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 93.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-4.00 sec 24.5 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-6.00 sec 23.6 MBytes 98.9 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-8.01 sec 24.2 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.01-10.00 sec 24.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 119 MBytes 99.7 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 119 MBytes 99.7 Mbits/sec receiver
* 공유기 2.4G 연결된 장치가 많아서 연결속도/다운속도가 떨어지는 것이 아닌가 합니다.
-
세상의모든계산기
무선 5G) hrping 핑 테스트
Packets: sent=1000, rcvd=999, error=0, lost=1 (0.1% loss) in 499.511706 sec
RTTs in ms: min/avg/max/dev: 1.509 / 13.751 / 507.855 / 24.991
Bandwidth in kbytes/sec: sent=0.120, rcvd=0.119
- 노트북->무선(5G)->AX2004T
- 테스트 중 유튜브 시청함
-
세상의모든계산기
노트북(클라이언트) -> 무선 5G -> AX2004T -> 유선 -> 데탑(PC, 서버)
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.23.5 -p 5000 -t 10 -f m -i 2
Connecting to host 192.168.23.5, port 5000
[ 4] local 192.168.23.2 port 5063 connected to 192.168.23.5 port 5000
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-2.00 sec 68.2 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-4.00 sec 65.6 MBytes 276 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-6.00 sec 73.6 MBytes 309 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-8.00 sec 67.9 MBytes 285 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-10.00 sec 70.2 MBytes 294 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 346 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 346 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
C:\iperf-3.1.3-win64>
세상의모든계산기 님의 최근 댓글
1. 왜 검은색이 아닌 다른 색으로 보일까? (제공된 LUT 필터) 제가 제공해 드린 magenta_lens.cube LUT 필터는 540~560nm(녹색-노란색) 파장대의 색상을 '완전히 제거(검은색으로 만듦)'하는 대신, '다른 색상으로 왜곡/변환'하도록 설계되었습니다. * 원리: LUT(Look-Up Table)는 특정 입력 색상(Input RGB)을 미리 정해진 다른 출력 색상(Output RGB)으로 매핑하는 테이블입니다. 이 LUT는 540~560nm에 해당하는 RGB 값들이 들어오면, 검은색(0, 0, 0)이 아닌, 매우 어둡거나 채도가 낮은 특정 색(예: 어두운 올리브색, 갈색 등)으로 변환하라고 지시합니다. * 의도: * 현실적인 물리 필터 시뮬레이션: 실제 고가의 색약 보정 안경도 특정 파장을 100% 완벽하게 차단하지는 못합니다. 빛의 일부를 흡수하고 일부는 통과시키거나 변환하는데, 이 LUT는 그러한 현실 세계의 필터 효과를 더 비슷하게 흉내 냈을 수 있습니다. * 시각적 정보 유지: 특정 색을 완전히 검게 만들면 그 부분의 형태나 질감 정보가 완전히 사라집니다. 하지만 다른 어두운 색으로 대체하면, 색상 정보는 왜곡되더라도 밝기나 형태 정보는 어느 정도 유지되어 전체적인 이미지가 덜 어색하게 보일 수 있습니다. 결론적으로, 스펙트럼 그림에서 해당 대역의 색이 갑자기 '다른 색으로 툭 바뀌는' 현상은, LUT 필터가 "이 파장대의 색은 앞으로 이 색으로 표시해!"라고 강제적으로 지시한 결과이며, 이것이 바로 이 필터가 작동하는 방식 그 자체입니다. 2. 왜 'Color Vision Helper' 앱은 검은색으로 보일까? 비교하신 'Color Vision Helper' 앱은 노치 필터의 원리를 더 이상적(Ideal)이고 교과서적으로 구현했을 가능성이 높습니다. * 원리: "L-콘과 M-콘의 신호가 겹치는 540~560nm 파장의 빛은 '완전히 차단'되어야 한다"는 개념에 매우 충실한 방식입니다. * 구현: 따라서 해당 파장에 해당하는 색상 정보가 들어오면, 어떠한 타협도 없이 그냥 '검은색(RGB 0, 0, 0)'으로 처리해 버립니다. 이는 "이 파장의 빛은 존재하지 않는 것으로 처리하겠다"는 가장 강력하고 직접적인 표현입니다. 2025 11.06 적용사례 4 - 파장 스펙트럼 https://news.samsungdisplay.com/26683 ㄴ (좌) 연속되는 그라데이션 ➡️ (우) 540 이하 | 구분되는 층(색) | 560 이상 - 겹치는 부분, 즉 540~560 nm 에서 색상이 차단? 변형? 된 것을 확인할 수 있음. 그럼 폰에서 Color Vision Helper 앱으로 보면? ㄴ 540~560 nm 대역이 검은 띠로 표시됨. 완전 차단됨을 의미 2025 11.05 빨간 셀로판지로도 이시하라 테스트 같은 숫자 구분에서는 유사한 효과를 낼 수 있다고 합니다. 색상이 다양하다면 빨강이나, 노랑, 주황 등도 테스트해보면 재밌겠네요. 2025 11.05 안드로이드 앱 - "Color Vision Helper" 다운받아 본문 내용을 카메라로 찍어 보니, 본문 프로그램에서는 애매하게 보이던 부분에서도 구분이 완전 확실하게 되네요. 숫자 구분 능력 & 편의성 면에서 압도적이라고 할 수 있겠습니다. 2025 11.05 적용 사례 3 - 색상표 https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%97%A5%EC%8A%A4%20%EC%BD%94%EB%93%9C 적녹 색약 기준에서 필터 후 색깔을 느낌으로 표현하면 녹색 계열이 좀 차분? 묵직? 해지는 느낌 적색 계열이 전반적으로 조화를 이루지 못하고 튀는? 느낌 노랑이가 사라지는 느낌. * 적색 계열에서 글씨가 살짝 안보이는 것은 계조 문제(프로그램 문제)일 수 있겠다는 생각 2025 11.04